Sunday, August 24, 2008

Look at me

I have to confess to a mild fascination with Pitchfork's infamous review of Black Kids' Partie Traumatic. Part of it is that Pitchfork's credibility took a hit as far as I'm concerned. I still look to them more than anyone for tasteful choices in new music, but that's been dialed down a notch now that they've chopped down not just an artist that they championed, but the same songs that they championed and without any explanation as to why. In that one review, a publication whose sincerity I had loved so much suddenly seemed all too self-aware of their status as tastemakers, and decided to play around, enjoying reversing their raves not out of any real change of heart, but just because they could. It kind of pissed me off, not enough to make me stop reading, but enough to make me raise my Eyebrow Of Skepticism (it's the left one) at their "Best New Music" ever since.

Black Kids, "Look At Me (When I Rock Wichoo)"
(mp3 removed. Subscribe to keep on top of our posts.)
buy album mp3s at Amazon

I think one of the biggest shames in Pitchfork's unexplained about-face is that a sincere lover of good-time pop music should love this record. It's 80's-aping and faux-Brit (they're from Florida), but it doesn't matter with songs like this. You have the Go! Team-style cheering and choruses that are catchy as hell, there's the disco beat with the dance floor cooldown in the middle, and it's all done with a genuine love that's hard to resist.

It may not be genius or an instant classic, but what I always respected about Pitchfork is that they could judge records by their artistic intent, knowing when to shrug off an artist's gimmicks (see: Vampire Weekend) or shortcomings to figure out what they're after there and rate the record on that. Maybe they had some good reason for panning Partie Traumatic, but since they never bothered to tell us what that was, I'll tell you now: it's a blast. Nothing more.

2 comments:

liz said...

Thank you for writing this. This whole "issue" has been bothering me since I saw that dog photo.

Thomas said...

Skepticism towards any critic's claim of "best new music" is probably a good policy. I downloaded their Wizard EP back when P4k reviewed it, and I did not get the appeal. They're certainly not terrible (I could see myself enjoying something like "Look At Me (When I Rock Wichoo)" in a live setting), but they still don't strike me as anything special.

While I'm not a fan, I completely agree with you that the P4k review was mean and totally not a good look for them.

I interpreted the "Sorry :-/" picture as the editor apologizing for P4k's hyping the band in the first place, and being a dumb asshole at the same time. What I think it meant was a kind of "Sorry that some of our writer's told you this band was good. This band actually sucks...but you should already know that." It's arrogant (he doesn't think he has to explain himself to those who disagree with him) and it completely insults the readers and P4k writers who actually like the band. It also confirms that Scott Plagenhoef thinks he's entitled, as editor-in-chief, to use the site as his personal playground. He also thinks he's funnier than he actually is.

Post a Comment